<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too picky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/</link>
	<description>&#34;You&#039;ve got to jump off cliffs all the time and build your wings on the way down.&#34; - Ray Bradbury</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:02:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: marjorie</title>
		<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>marjorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingmywings.com/?p=459#comment-263</guid>
		<description>righteous post, fawn. 

i think there are women out there like gottlieb who spent their 20s and 30s with insane checklists. but that&#039;s not most of the single women i know. my reaction to the atlantic article was that gottlieb wasn&#039;t really writing about &quot;settling&quot; at all -- she was writing about how hard it is to be a single parent. and it is extraordinarily hard. but how could she not have known?? did she do no research? did she think she could write with the baby cooing quietly in a moses basket at her feet for hours on end?? and really, does being saddled with a second set of responsibilities, in the form of a spouse you shouldn&#039;t have married but you did because you didn&#039;t want to be a single parent, make things better? 

all that said: i know her a bit. she seems like a lovely person. she blurbed my book, and on like NO notice, and graciously. and i&#039;ve only read the Atlantic piece, not the book. i suspect her &quot;marry him&quot; directive applies only to women who were as rigid in their criteria as she was...which is, again, not most of us. (my type is peter&#039;s wife&#039;s type -- super-tall neurasthenic broad-shouldered rangy aesthete-swimmer! -- and yet i married a barrel-chested operatic-bass type. and he had one of those bad mid-90s computer-geek haircuts and wore a purple leather jacket with epaulets! but damn he was smart, and kind, and moral, and funny. i made him over eventually. the inner workings were quite sound.) 

also appreciate peter&#039;s point that gottlieb&#039;s point of view is now the contrarian one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>righteous post, fawn. </p>
<p>i think there are women out there like gottlieb who spent their 20s and 30s with insane checklists. but that&#8217;s not most of the single women i know. my reaction to the atlantic article was that gottlieb wasn&#8217;t really writing about &#8220;settling&#8221; at all &#8212; she was writing about how hard it is to be a single parent. and it is extraordinarily hard. but how could she not have known?? did she do no research? did she think she could write with the baby cooing quietly in a moses basket at her feet for hours on end?? and really, does being saddled with a second set of responsibilities, in the form of a spouse you shouldn&#8217;t have married but you did because you didn&#8217;t want to be a single parent, make things better? </p>
<p>all that said: i know her a bit. she seems like a lovely person. she blurbed my book, and on like NO notice, and graciously. and i&#8217;ve only read the Atlantic piece, not the book. i suspect her &#8220;marry him&#8221; directive applies only to women who were as rigid in their criteria as she was&#8230;which is, again, not most of us. (my type is peter&#8217;s wife&#8217;s type &#8212; super-tall neurasthenic broad-shouldered rangy aesthete-swimmer! &#8212; and yet i married a barrel-chested operatic-bass type. and he had one of those bad mid-90s computer-geek haircuts and wore a purple leather jacket with epaulets! but damn he was smart, and kind, and moral, and funny. i made him over eventually. the inner workings were quite sound.) </p>
<p>also appreciate peter&#8217;s point that gottlieb&#8217;s point of view is now the contrarian one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fawn</title>
		<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Fawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingmywings.com/?p=459#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I think your point -- that some things are more important than others -- is the point Gottlieb was TRYING to make. Unfortunately, by using the word &quot;settled,&quot; she implied something a lot less sensible. 

It&#039;s not a new frame; it&#039;s just the one that&#039;s getting the most attention at the moment in a culture that, for all its protestations to the contrary, still pretty much uses a woman&#039;s relationship status as tangible proof of her worth as a human being (or lack thereof).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your point &#8212; that some things are more important than others &#8212; is the point Gottlieb was TRYING to make. Unfortunately, by using the word &#8220;settled,&#8221; she implied something a lot less sensible. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a new frame; it&#8217;s just the one that&#8217;s getting the most attention at the moment in a culture that, for all its protestations to the contrary, still pretty much uses a woman&#8217;s relationship status as tangible proof of her worth as a human being (or lack thereof).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter-john Byrnes</title>
		<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter-john Byrnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingmywings.com/?p=459#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Well, all joking aside, it is the case that if Kelly had stuck to her &quot;ideal mate&quot; list, I wouldn&#039;t have been seriously considered.  Kelly&#039;s &quot;type,&quot; if you ask her, is tall and rangy, like Clint Eastwood or Sam Elliott.  I&#039;m (ahem) about a foot shorter than that and am built like an Irish bulldog.  I don&#039;t think this proves that Kelly &quot;settled,&quot; but rather that she prioritized what was on her list and realized that physicality didn&#039;t matter as much as other things.

Or my marriage is a hollow sham.  That&#039;s also possible, I suppose.

I find this new frame merely evidence that The Atlantic has a dubious talent for finding writers who have the ability to make nonsensical contrarian arguments that mash readers&#039; buttons.  And that male newspaper editors love a man-bites-dog lifestyle article, especially if it suggests that all the women who ever dumped them and remained single are miserable now.

I think we should take some comfort that Gottlieb&#039;s point of view is now the contrarian one.  That&#039;s progress of a sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, all joking aside, it is the case that if Kelly had stuck to her &#8220;ideal mate&#8221; list, I wouldn&#8217;t have been seriously considered.  Kelly&#8217;s &#8220;type,&#8221; if you ask her, is tall and rangy, like Clint Eastwood or Sam Elliott.  I&#8217;m (ahem) about a foot shorter than that and am built like an Irish bulldog.  I don&#8217;t think this proves that Kelly &#8220;settled,&#8221; but rather that she prioritized what was on her list and realized that physicality didn&#8217;t matter as much as other things.</p>
<p>Or my marriage is a hollow sham.  That&#8217;s also possible, I suppose.</p>
<p>I find this new frame merely evidence that The Atlantic has a dubious talent for finding writers who have the ability to make nonsensical contrarian arguments that mash readers&#8217; buttons.  And that male newspaper editors love a man-bites-dog lifestyle article, especially if it suggests that all the women who ever dumped them and remained single are miserable now.</p>
<p>I think we should take some comfort that Gottlieb&#8217;s point of view is now the contrarian one.  That&#8217;s progress of a sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fawn</title>
		<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Fawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingmywings.com/?p=459#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Once a prince, always a prince. But once a knight is enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a prince, always a prince. But once a knight is enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fawn</title>
		<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Fawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingmywings.com/?p=459#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Peter, I would not say that at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I would not say that at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter-john Byrnes</title>
		<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter-john Byrnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingmywings.com/?p=459#comment-258</guid>
		<description>For the record, I am delighted that my wife has low standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I am delighted that my wife has low standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gollnick</title>
		<link>http://buildingmywings.com/2010/02/08/too-picky/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gollnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingmywings.com/?p=459#comment-257</guid>
		<description>First of all, the guy may have just been trying to flirt some more--you know--creating a little exasperation to put him in a place of less vulnerability.  He may have also had a learning disability.  I don&#039;t know, I wasn&#039;t there.

But one of the things that stuck me in your eloquent prose above, was this search for a prince.  Ladies (and gentlemen), there are a lot of princes out there and it&#039;s hard to know what to choose.  My advice is this... 

Look for the prince who can be a good king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, the guy may have just been trying to flirt some more&#8211;you know&#8211;creating a little exasperation to put him in a place of less vulnerability.  He may have also had a learning disability.  I don&#8217;t know, I wasn&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>But one of the things that stuck me in your eloquent prose above, was this search for a prince.  Ladies (and gentlemen), there are a lot of princes out there and it&#8217;s hard to know what to choose.  My advice is this&#8230; </p>
<p>Look for the prince who can be a good king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
